I Went Back to my Kindergarten Class of 1958– Here is What I Told Them

Show and Tell, 67 Years Later

I arrive in Whitestone, Queens, in the soft, milk-glass light of 1958. The air smells faintly of chalk and floor wax. The sidewalks are narrower, the cars longer, the future quieter. I push open the classroom door and there you all are—knees scabbed, collars starched, haircuts obedient to gravity and mothers. Mrs. LaPenna stands watch, ruler nearby, smile doing most of the work.

You look up at me as if I’m a substitute teacher who took a wrong turn off the Whitestone Expressway. I tell you I’m one of you—just borrowed from a later inning of the same game. I’m here on a time pass from 2025, and I don’t have long.

I start with the easy truths.

“First,” I say, “you’re growing up in a good moment. The Dodgers have left Brooklyn, which hurts, but the Yankees are still a juggernaut. Elvis is on the radio. Ike is in the White House. Polio is on the ropes. Milk comes in bottles and your parents still believe tomorrow will be better because it usually is.”

A few of you grin. One kid in the front row adjusts his bow tie like it’s armor.

“Second,” I say, “hold onto this room. You won’t know it now, but classrooms like this—blackboard dust, wooden desks, a teacher who knows your full name—are where the country learns how to argue without fighting. You’ll need that skill.”

I tell you what’s coming, gently.

“There will be a man on television named Kennedy who makes politics look young. There will be marches where people insist—out loud—that America live up to its own handwriting. There will be a war you’ll see every night at dinner. Some of you will go. Some of you will protest. Most of you will just try to make sense of it all.”

You fidget. Big words for small shoes.

“So here’s the advice,” I say, and I lean in because advice should never be shouted.

“Be curious longer than is comfortable. Read beyond the assignment. Learn how things work—your body, a carburetor, a balance sheet, a sentence. When the world tells you to pick a side fast, slow down. Speed makes noise; understanding makes progress.”

I point to the windows. “Neighborhoods change. Whitestone will still be here, but it will look different. That’s not a loss—it’s a relay. You’ll carry what matters and pass it on.”

I pause, then add the part I didn’t know in kindergarten.

“You will fail at things you’re good at and succeed at things you never planned. That’s not hypocrisy—it’s growth. Be kind to yourself when the map gets smudged.”

Someone asks about the future—always the future.

I smile. “In 2025, you’ll carry a small rectangle in your pocket that knows almost everything. It will be miraculous and distracting. Use it to learn, not to disappear. And when it tells you the world is on fire, remember this room. Remember how a group of five-year-olds once sat still long enough to listen.”

Mrs. LaPenna clears her throat—the bell is coming.

“One more thing,” I say. “Call your parents more than you think you should. Thank teachers while you can. Save a photograph like this and look at it when you’re unsure who you are. You’re in here. So is everyone you’ll ever be.”

The bell rings. Chairs scrape. Time tightens.

As I step back into 2025, the chalk dust follows me for a second, then settles. I carry it with me—the proof that before the headlines and the hindsight, before the decades did what decades do, there was a room in Whitestone where the future sat cross-legged and waited its turn to speak.

Santa, ChatGPT and the end of the Naughty-Nice Era

t

Published Christmas Day

I watched Pluribus recently, and the idea has been quietly stalking me ever since. The show imagines a superhuman race endowed with infinite knowledge and perfect cooperation. No individuality. No hierarchy of skill. No one stands out, because no one can. There’s no schadenfreude—failure doesn’t exist. There’s no long educational climb, no apprenticeship, no grinding effort to elevate oneself above the rest. Everyone knows everything. Everyone performs equally well.

It’s an orderly world. Efficient. Bloodless.

What struck me wasn’t the absence of conflict—it was the absence of accomplishment. If distinction disappears, what does it mean to achieve anything at all?

That thought followed me straight into our own present moment.

The Great Leveling

We are already living through a quieter version of Pluribus. Recall—once a badge of intelligence—has been demoted to a parlor trick. Sports trivia, historical dates, obscure facts: once markers of expertise, now solvable in seconds by a glowing rectangle in your pocket. You don’t need to know anymore; you just need to search.

And writing—my particular arena—has become the most unsettling test case.

You write a rough draft. It’s honest. Thoughtful. Maybe even good. Then curiosity (or temptation) intervenes. You ask an AI to revise it.

What comes back is cleaner. Sharper. Better structured. The prose you meant to write.

You shrug—not because it failed, but because it succeeded.

So whose work is it now?

Confession Time

The version you are reading was edited—significantly—by ChatGPT. I wrote the draft. I shaped the ideas. But the clarity, the flow, the tightening of loose bolts? That was machine-assisted.

Is that cheating? Is it collaboration? Is it no different from spellcheck, or fundamentally different because the tool now competes with the craftsman?

I don’t have a clean answer. Only an honest one: pretending this isn’t happening feels more dishonest than acknowledging it outright.

Christmas, Santa, and the Algorithm

And since this is Christmas Day, it feels appropriate to bring Santa into the discussion.

For centuries, Santa Claus has run the most ambitious surveillance-based performance-evaluation system in history. Naughty. Nice. Binary. Efficient. Judgment rendered annually, with toys as incentives and coal as penalties.

But imagine Santa with AI.

No more vague moral assessments. No secondhand elf reports. Just a comprehensive dataset: search histories, impulse buys, tone of emails, patience in traffic, comment-section behavior. Naughty and Nice reduced to an algorithmic score.

Santa outsourced.

If that sounds unsettling, it should. Yet it mirrors our larger dilemma: when judgment itself becomes automated, where does human discretion fit? When assessment is perfect, what room remains for grace, growth, or redemption?

What’s Left That’s Ours

AI can recall better than we can. Write faster. Polish endlessly. It can outperform us in domains we once believed defined intelligence and creativity.

But it didn’t decide this question was worth asking.

It didn’t feel uneasy watching Pluribus.

It didn’t wonder whether accomplishment itself is being quietly deprecated.

What remains human—for now—is judgment, taste, values, and the discomfort that comes with change. The choice of what to pursue, why it matters, and when to stop optimizing.

In a world sliding toward Pluribus, individuality may no longer come from knowing more—but from caring differently.

A Christmas Thought

Christmas has always been about imperfect humans trying to be a little better than they were the year before. Not optimized. Not flawless. Just better.

If AI eventually knows everything, writes everything, and judges everything—including Santa’s lists—then perhaps the last true human accomplishment will be choosing imperfection when perfection is available at the click of a button.

This post was edited by ChatGPT.

The unease behind it was not.

Merry Christmas.

“Back in My Day”: A Field Guide to Modern Sticker Shock


There’s a sound older people make when they see a grocery receipt.

It’s not quite a groan, not quite a gasp — more like the sound you’d make if someone told you a gallon of milk now costs more than your first apartment.

It’s the sound of inflation-induced disbelief — the national anthem of anyone over seventy.

We don’t mean to complain. We simply remember when things were affordable — back before the Dow, the debt, and the avocado entered their current bull markets.

When Everything Was a Quarter

In the late 1960s, a loaf of bread cost twenty-five cents.

Milk was eighty-nine.

A gallon of gas was thirty-six cents, and the guy pumping it cleaned your windshield without asking for a tip or your Wi-Fi password.

The subway in New York was twenty cents — the same price as a phone call or a cup of coffee, both of which involved more warmth than bandwidth.

Now the subway is $2.90, coffee is $7, and the phone call has been replaced by a “Zoom follow-up.”

Progress, apparently, has a subscription fee.

The Egg Cream Index

But nothing, nothing, captures the moral collapse of American pricing like the Egg Cream.

In Queens, NY in 1968, an egg cream — that fizzy, chocolatey, seltzer miracle — cost 25 cents.

It was cheap, delicious, and, for reasons no one could explain, contained no egg and no cream.

Last month, I ordered one in West Palm Beach.

It was artisanal, hand-stirred, and served in a mason jar — because apparently all beverages must now resemble something from a farm wedding.

The price: $5.75.

For that, I expected at least a side of nostalgia and maybe a complimentary trip back to Queens.

Tuition, Steak, and Other Crimes Against Memory

In 1972, you could attend a public university for about $400 a year.

Today, that might cover textbooks — and not even the digital kind.

A rib-eye steak, once $2.49 a pound, now costs $17.

Same cow. Different accountant.

I recently saw a dozen “pasture-raised, stress-free” eggs for $7.99.

At that price, they should hatch a trust fund.

The Myth of Modern Improvement

We’re told things are better now: cars are safer, thermostats talk, and milk has 47 plant-based alternatives.

Yet somehow, the grocery cart has become a rolling cry for help.

In 1968, I bought a a used Oldsmobile Cutlass for $800.

It started with a key, not a retina scan.

Now it politely reminds me I’m late for a subscription oil change.

We used to own things.

Now we rent the illusion of ownership and call it “smart living.”

The Economics of Outrage

Wages have risen too, but not nearly enough to prevent the occasional coronary event in the produce aisle.

The cashier asked if I’d like to “round up” for charity.

I told her, “At these prices, I am the charity.”

Why We Complain (and Why We’re Right)

Younger people think we’re nostalgic.

We’re not.

We’re auditors of reality.

We complain not out of bitterness but because we remember a time when a splurge meant ordering dessert — not securing financing.

Our griping isn’t crankiness. It’s fiscal anthropology.

Perspective, Adjusted for Inflation

Back in my day, a dollar was a dollar.

It could buy a newspaper, 4 cups of coffee, and the comforting illusion that adulthood came with change back.

Now, a dollar buys… anxiety.

Yes, we live longer, travel faster, and have refrigerators that snitch on us for running out of oat milk.

But deep down, I’d trade it all for one more twenty-cent subway ride, a twenty-five-cent egg cream, and the satisfying thunk of a TV turning off.

The Moral (Priced to Sell)

So when you hear an older person sigh at the gas pump or glare at the eggs, don’t roll your eyes.

We’re not angry — we’re doing mental arithmetic in 1972 dollars.

And in 1972, math was free, too.

\.

Rooting for the Underdog

When you’re young, you imagine yourself winning a Nobel Prize, writing a bestselling novel, or penning the next great American song. Then life happens—you wake up one day and find yourself flipping hamburgers at Burger King. Somewhere along the way, you pivot from being the dreamer to cheering for the dreamers. You become a fan, hitching your self-esteem to the fortunes of a sports team.

I was born into a family of winners. The Yankees had just finished winning five straight World Series, and the New York Giants were NFL champions. By birthright, I should have basked in dynasties forever. But as I got older, both franchises slipped back toward mediocrity.

Then came San Diego, 1979. I was an intern at the VA hospital when the Charger Girls made a visit to cheer up patients. Let’s just say the uniforms left an impression. Later that night, after a series of code blues (possibly fueled by a collective octogenarian cortisol surge), I found myself captivated by the Chargers.

They were led by head coach Don “Air” Coryell, a visionary who believed in the forward pass when everyone else was grinding out two yards and a cloud of dust. I was in Pacific Beach when Dan Fouts and Kellen Winslow battled the Dolphins in that double-overtime playoff classic. Even Howard Cosell’s toupee seemed altered by the drama. But then came the AFC Championship in Cincinnati. The temperature hovered near absolute zero, and Fouts’ throwing hand must have felt like gripping liquid nitrogen. Another dream frozen.

Years rolled by, and the Chargers remained football’s Sisyphus—preseason darlings, postseason heartbreakers. Raiders, Broncos, Chiefs: the tormentors never changed. My kids climbed aboard the same rollercoaster, caught between optimism and despair.

There were highs: LaDainian Tomlinson breaking the rushing record. And there were lows: LT injured in the playoffs, Phillip Rivers throwing for miles in the first three quarters only to sputter in the fourth (sleep deprivation courtesy of his nine children, no doubt). And then there was the day I took my kids and a good friend to a Chargers playoff game against the Jets. The Chargers were heavy favorites, the Jets were starting a rookie quarterback named Mark Sanchez—and yet San Diego managed to miss three field goals and hand the game away. Sanchez, who basically had the job description “don’t screw it up,” walked out the hero. The long drive home felt like we were leaving a wake, only quieter.

Fast forward to last Thursday night against the Chiefs. The Chargers had lost 11 of their last one-score games. My sons, now with 30 years of futility under his belt, turned to me. I told them mine was going on 50. Yet somehow, Justin Herbert scrambled for a last-second first down and the Chargers won. For one night, euphoria reigned.

Could this be the year? Could the Chargers finally shed their underdog skin?

And if so, maybe—just maybe—this will be the year I finally win that Nobel Prize and write a hit song.

Stay tuned.

Labor Day and the Gospel of Work (and Cupcakes)

Labor Day makes me nostalgic. Not for parades, speeches, or backyard grills, but for the curious collection of jobs that introduced me to the American workforce. Each one a rung on the ladder, or maybe a Hostess cupcake on the vending machine coil.

Lawn Mowers and Cash Drawers

It all began in Clearview, mowing lawns in the humid heat for a few bucks and a sore back. Soon after, I graduated to the high-tech world of the high school bookstore, where I operated an NCR cash register. Nothing teaches math faster than a line of impatient teenagers waiting for their pencils and erasers while you wrestle with a drawer that refuses to open.

Big City, Small Jobs

Then came New York City in the late 1960s. I worked for a large textile firm, which is a glamorous way of saying I put checks in order and filed papers. The highlight of my day wasn’t the paycheck, but the two 15-minute breaks. They were sacrosanct — mini-holidays from tedium. Best of all, the vending machine reliably delivered two Hostess cupcakes for a quarter. Talk about compound interest: two for the price of one.

The Printing Press Apprenticeship

In North Queens, I found myself sweeping scraps in a printing factory with Dominican Republican immigrants. They ran the presses; I ran the broom. I like to think I was perfecting an ancient art form — paper scrap feng shui. It was honest work, even if it left me dustier than a chalkboard.

Clerks, Typists, and Crises

As a college graduate, I became a clerk typist at a mental health clinic on Long Island, recording the anxiety and depression of young and middle-aged patients wrestling with the life crises of the mid-1970s. It was a front-row seat to the human condition, typewritten one page at a time.

I later fulfilled my dream to attend an Ivy League school — not as a student, but as a clerk typist for a renowned Organic Chemistry professor at Columbia. The pre-med students tried to peer over my shoulder to steal exam questions, as if my typewriter were some kind of oracle.

At the American Health Foundation, I typed case-control study questions about cancer prevalence. Occasionally, I was even promoted to ghostwriter for love letters from esteemed scientists — proof that the line between research and romance is thinner than a sheet of carbon paper.

A Salute to Work

Each of those jobs was a tiny cog in the great machine of American productivity. From mowing lawns to sweeping floors to transcribing science (and scandal), I contributed my modest share to the GDP. And on Labor Day, I cherish not just the opportunities this country gave me, but also the workers beside me: the immigrants, the clerks, the professors, and yes — even the vending machine that believed in generosity.

Because in the end, Labor Day isn’t just about honoring work. It’s about recognizing that every job — no matter how small, boring, or sugar-coated — is a building block in the story of our country.

Golden Teachers: The Ones Who Shaped Us

There are people who pass through our lives and leave behind only a vague memory. And then there are teachers.

Teachers are the architects of our minds, the engineers of our values, the subtle sculptors of who we become. Their lessons go far beyond the blackboard—or these days, the touchscreen. While artificial intelligence may assist in learning, it will never replace the magic of chalk dust, a well-timed joke in a lecture, or the moment a teacher sees something in you before you ever see it in yourself.

My own journey through education is dotted with unforgettable figures who each gave me something I carry to this day.

Mr. Axelrod – 6th Grade, New York

He taught more than spelling and long division. Mr. Axelrod taught life. I remember one lesson that would never be in a textbook: “If you’re in a fight, throw the first punch.” Now, before you gasp, understand—this wasn’t about violence. It was about courage. About taking initiative. About standing up when you needed to. It was his way of saying, “Don’t let life back you into a corner.”

But Mr. Axelrod’s influence extended beyond the classroom. He was the orchestrator of student power at PS 209. He controlled and delegated the coveted positions of crossing guards—our law enforcement—and the elite slide and motion picture crews who operated the school’s visual media for assemblies. We were, to our minds, the penultimate intelligentsia—just one rung below Mrs. Pompa’s gifted “1” class. But looking back, I came to see that Mr. Axelrod gave us something perhaps more profound than gifted designation: he gave us influence. He showed us the power of controlling law enforcement and the narrative, even in the microcosm of an elementary school. A lesson in civics disguised as a privilege

Mrs. Rogart – 10th Grade Geometry

Geometry came alive in her classroom—truly alive, with chalk fragments flying in arcs that rivaled any parabolic graph. She attacked the blackboard with energy, hair in motion, proofs tumbling out until she capped it all off with an emphatic, sweeping “Q.E.D.”—which she translated as “Quite Easily Done.” With her, Euclid had flair. She made logic feel like art.

Mr. Barash – High School Social Studies

He didn’t just teach geography or history—he taught us how to think. He challenged us to look at the world with a geopolitical lens before most of us could spell “geopolitical.” He made us understand the causes behind the causes, the story behind the headline. It wasn’t about memorizing; it was about seeing.

Dr. Smith – College Biology

Now here’s a man who gave the phrase “learning in a bar” a good name. His office was the Rathskeller, a dimly lit pub in the bowels of the student union. There, over locally brewed Buffalo beer, he spun tales of fruit fly taxonomy that somehow made us want to memorize Latin names. He humanized science. He made it social, even fun.

Dr. Bugelski – Educational Psychology

It’s been over five decades, but I can still recite his lectures. That’s how vivid his theatrical delivery on learning and memory was. He didn’t just teach psychology—he performed it. He didn’t just explain the theories of learning—he embodied them. In a strange way, he implanted his lessons permanently in our neural networks.

Dr. Berman – Pharmacology, Medical School

He taught us the music of medicine. With cadence and rhythm, he embedded the pharmacopoeia into our green med student brains. We didn’t just memorize drugs—we felt them. His lessons were like a drumbeat: precise, repetitive, unforgettable.

Dr. Sam Rapaport – Hematology

Dr. Rapaport was the kind of physician we all aspired to be. A legendary hematologist with encyclopedic knowledge, yet he never lost his kindness. At the bedside, he modeled compassion with every word and gesture. His brilliance was exceeded only by his humility. I spent my career trying to emulate the grace he brought into every room.

Teachers like these are irreplaceable. Their impact is timeless.

Yes, AI may write essays, solve equations, or simulate patient encounters. But it can’t throw chalk with reckless joy. It can’t wink when you finally grasp a hard concept. It doesn’t pour wisdom into a dark corner of a campus pub. And it surely doesn’t leave behind the lasting rhythm of a mentor’s voice echoing across the decades.

Teachers are golden. Their value isn’t in their output—it’s in their humanity.

We revere them because they gave us more than facts.
They gave us ourselves.

You’ve Got a Friend: A Night with James Taylor at The Rady Shell

There are concerts, and then there are moments in time that become stitched into the fabric of your memory—softly, indelibly. That’s what happened the other night at The Rady Shell in San Diego, where James Taylor performed under a perfect spring sky.Seagulls glided above the stage, effortlessly catching the breeze like backup dancers choreographed by nature. In the distance, boats floated lazily off Coronado, their sails catching the golden hour light as Taylor’s warm voice wove its way into the ocean air.

It’s true—his voice isn’t what it once was. The range has narrowed, some edges are softer now. But none of that mattered. Because when the first chords of Sweet Baby James rang out, something vivid and unstoppable happened: the floodgates opened. I was back in college, a freshman clutching the brand-new album like it was a sacred text. I could hear myself humming Mexico as we rattled down dusty roads in North Baja, lobsters and beans on our minds. The windows were open. The future was wide.

Time folded that night, like a concert program tucked into a jacket pocket. I looked around and saw my dearest friends and my spouse—people I’ve known for most of my life—illuminated by the soft light of the moon. Their faces glowed with familiarity and joy, made more poignant by the music weaving through the air.

And then, of course, James sang You’ve Got a Friend.

There it was: the reminder, gentle and true, that while our hair may have greyed and our voices quieted, the people who’ve walked with us through all of it are still here. In the same row. Still smiling. Still listening.

As the last note drifted out over the bay, past the gulls and the sailboats and the California light, I realized the music didn’t need to be perfect—it just needed to be shared.

Moose on the Loose in Park City

Over the years, skiing with family and friends at Park City has provided a tapestry of memories filled with laughter, excitement, and the occasional brush with wildlife drama. This year, however, felt like an episode from National Geographic invaded our alpine playground.

On a crisp, sunny morning at Canyon’s Docs Run, our planned descent was unexpectedly delayed—not by the usual rogue snowboarder—but due to a moose sighting reported by ski patrol. The run was promptly blocked off for half an hour, allowing the majestic visitor time to leisurely return to its natural habitat away from the groomed trails.

The next day, as we sipped coffee and enjoyed freshly toasted Utah bagels at the condo, we discovered fresh bobcat tracks weaving through our patio, some furniture overturned as if inspected and dismissed by our nocturnal visitor. Clearly, the local wildlife had decided to reclaim their territory, turning our cozy resort into a surprising alpine jungle.

Reflecting on decades of skiing in these very mountains, the landscape hasn’t changed much, though perhaps my approach to skiing certainly has. Now firmly in what I affectionately call my ‘geriatric skiing phase,’ every run is an artful dance of taming gravity, gliding over ice, powder, and avoiding clusters of snowplow skiers and ambitious boarders. Each turn comes with whispered prayers for ligaments and tendons to remain firmly intact, a gentle negotiation between exhilaration and caution.

Yet, despite these cautionary moments, skiing continues to weave its magic, binding generations of family and friends together. Park City remains our snowy sanctuary, ever ready to gift us yet another unforgettable story—moose detours, bobcat tracks, and all.

The Tragic Tale of TV Theme Songs: From Gilligan’s Island  to Whatever This Is Now

Ah, the 1960s and 1970s when TV theme songs were more than just filler. They were spectacles. They were anthems. They were the reason you sat through the credits, pretending to pay attention while your popcorn got cold and your sibling snatched the last cookie. But today? TV theme songs have become like the sad parsley on a microwaved dinner unnecessary and mostly forgotten. Let’s take a wild ride through the glory days of TV theme songs, from The Beverly Hillbillies to Gilligan’s Island and then to the sad, meme-driven shadow of today’s intros.

The Glory Days: When TV Theme Songs Were Basically Broadway

Back in the good old days, TV theme songs weren’t just there to fill air time, they told entire stories. They set the stage, introduced the characters, and gave you everything you needed to know in a minute or less. Take The Beverly Hillbillies, for instance. That banjo-fueled ballad didn’t just say, “Hey, the Clampetts got rich and moved to Beverly Hills” No, no. It invited you into their world, where you could almost smell the cement pond and taste the possum stew. You felt like you were right there, sitting on the front porch in a rocking chair, staring at their brand-new mansion.

And then there’s Gilligan’s Island. The Ballad of Gilligan’s Island wasn’t just a theme song, it was a full-on epic. In less than a minute, it not only explained why seven people were stranded on a deserted island, but also gave you their names, jobs, and a helpful warning that the weather started getting rough.It was Homers Odyssey, but with more coconuts and fewer monsters. If you didn’t know the lyrics to that song, well, you might as well have been from a different galaxy.

The Decline: When Theme Songs Became the Sad, Overlooked Stepchild

Now let’s talk about what happened to TV theme songs as we entered the age of streaming, smartphones, and the complete destruction of patience. Today’s theme songs are like the intro credits of The Office, short, forgettable, and so uninspired that even the animated sequence feels like it’s just phoning it in. In fact, modern shows treat theme songs like a necessary evil, something to slap together so they don’t get sued for not having one. Now, they’re lucky if we get a 10-second jingle that barely manages to say, Hey, this is a show, before its done and we’re on to the next scene.

What happened? Did we suddenly decide that listening to full songs was too much of a commitment? Did Netflix declare, Sorry, theme songs, we’re all about the plot twists and memes now? Or did every banjo player in Hollywood just retire? (Seriously, where are all the banjo players?)

The Beverly Hillbillies vs. Modern TV: A Tale of Two Eras

Let’s break it down, shall we?

 The Beverly Hillbillies: A glorious minute of banjo strumming that gives you everything Jed Clampett, his kinfolk, and how they went from being poor mountain folk to Beverly Hills royalty. A true rags-to-riches anthem. You didn’t just watch it, you hummed along.

 Modern Show: A five-second instrumental that sounds like a kitten tiptoeing across a Moog synthesizer. You don’t learn anything about the characters, the plot, or why you should care. You’re left wondering if you accidentally clicked on a screensaver.

It’s like comparing a five-course meal to a stale cracker. One’s rich with flavor and history, the others are just there.

Gilligan’s Island vs. Streaming Services: A Three-Act Tragedy

Now, let’s pit Gilligan’s Island against the modern streaming era:

 Gilligan’s Island: A full-blown ballad that explained everything in under a minute. You knew who was on that island, why they were there, and how long they’d be stuck (spoiler: a three-hour tour). It was the perfect blend of exposition and entertainment.

 Streaming Show: A 10-second loop of ambient noise that doesn’t even try to explain what’s happening. You’re left wondering if you accidentally clicked on the Welcome to 1998 screensaver on your desktop.

It’s like Shakespeare writing Macbeth and modern TV offering up a text message that just says K.

The Why of It All: What Happened to TV Theme Songs?

So, what happened? How did we go from The Beverly Hillbillies to whatever is happening now? Some might say it’s the rise of streaming and the skip intro button. Others might blame the constant need for instant gratification. Who has time for a full song when you can just dive into the plot with minimal effort? The attention span of viewers has drastically shrunk, and I’m sure TikTok isn’t helping.

But the real loss here is the joy that a great theme song can bring. A good theme song was like a friend you could rely on familiar, exciting, and always there for you. Sure, they might’ve been a little cheesy, but that’s part of their charm. We miss the days when the theme song could make or break a show.

A Call to Action: Bring Back the Theme Song!

I know you’re out there, TV producers. You may have forgotten about the power of a good theme song, but I haven’t. We need to bring back the iconic, catchy, slightly ridiculous theme songs that made us sing along and set the mood for every episode. Give us something that lasts more than the time it takes to grab a snack.

Until then, I’ll be here, humming the Gilligan’s Island theme and waiting for the day when a show dares to give us a theme song worthy of a standing ovation.

Just sit right back and you’ll hear a tale…

Minnie Riperton: The Voice, The Song, and The Legacy

Minnie Riperton, a name synonymous with ethereal melodies and unparalleled vocal talent, left an indelible mark on the music world. Her iconic song “Lovin’ You”, her breathtaking five-octave range, and her heartbreaking battle with breast cancer combine to tell a story of artistry, love, and resilience.

Released in 1975 as part of her album Perfect Angel, “Lovin’ You” became Riperton’s signature song. It’s a dreamy ballad that radiates warmth and intimacy, often remembered for its gentle melody and the iconic birdsong in the background. What many may not know is that the song was deeply personal.

Riperton wrote “Lovin’ You” as a tribute to her family, particularly her young daughter, Maya Rudolph—yes, the same Maya Rudolph who would go on to become a beloved actress and comedian. Minnie herself revealed that Maya was in the studio during the recording, and the gentle spirit of the song was meant to embody the love and peace she felt for her daughter and husband, Richard Rudolph.

The famous line, “Maya, Maya, Maya”, sung softly at the end of the song, immortalized the bond between mother and daughter. This subtle inclusion made the song even more special, as it was a lullaby-like expression of maternal love.

A Voice Like No Other!

Riperton’s vocal prowess was unmatched. Trained in operatic techniques, she was renowned for her five-octave range, a rarity in popular music. Her ability to effortlessly glide into the whistle register—those impossibly high notes—set her apart. The purity and control of her voice were showcased in “Lovin’ You,” where she used her upper register to create a dreamy, almost celestial quality.

Her technical skill was complemented by her emotional depth, making her music both technically impressive and profoundly moving. Riperton was often compared to a songbird, a metaphor that became literal in the background sounds of “Lovin’ You.”

Her Battle with Breast Cancer

Tragically, Minnie Riperton’s life was cut short by breast cancer. Diagnosed in 1976, she was one of the first celebrities to publicly share her battle with the disease. She became a spokesperson for the American Cancer Society, using her platform to raise awareness about early detection and treatment.

Despite her diagnosis, Riperton continued to perform and record music, demonstrating incredible strength and resilience. Her song “Memory Lane” from her 1979 album Minnie reflects the depth of her emotions during her illness, capturing both her pain and hope.

Minnie Riperton passed away on July 12, 1979, at the age of 31, leaving behind her husband and two children, including Maya, who was only seven at the time. Her death was a devastating loss to her family, friends, and fans.

The Legacy of Minnie Riperton

Though her life was tragically short, Riperton’s influence endures. Her music continues to inspire countless artists, and her vocal abilities remain a benchmark of excellence. Maya Rudolph has often spoken about her mother’s legacy, carrying her memory into her own creative work.

Minnie Riperton’s story is one of immense talent, unwavering love, and profound courage. Whether you listen to “Lovin’ You” to marvel at her vocal brilliance or to feel the love she poured into it, you’re connecting with an artist who transcended the limits of time and space.

Her music, much like her spirit, remains timeless.